ethicsAIfundraising

Ethical Considerations for Communities Using AI to Generate Member Testimonials

UUnknown

2026-02-22

10 min read

A 2026 guide for community leaders on using AI-assisted testimonials and simulated reenactments ethically for fundraising.

When fundraising meets deepfakes: Ethical boundaries for AI-assisted member testimonials

Hook: You need compelling stories to raise funds and build trust, but many community leaders and group facilitators worry: how do I use AI to create testimonial videos or reenactments without violating members’ rights or trust?

In 2026, short-form AI video tools and vertical platforms — from startup ecosystems like Holywater expanding AI-powered vertical video to major broadcasters experimenting on YouTube with BBC-style production deals — make creating polished testimonial content easier than ever. At the same time, recent episodes of misuse (e.g., independent tools enabling nonconsensual synthetic content on social platforms) sharpen the stakes. This guide gives community leaders, coaches, and group makers a practical ethics playbook for using AI testimonials and simulated reenactments ethically, legally, and compassionately — especially when those materials are used for fundraising or public awareness.

The 2026 context: Why the issue matters now

In late 2025 and early 2026 the media landscape accelerated two trends that directly affect community storytelling:

Rapid adoption of AI-first vertical video platforms (e.g., Holywater’s 2026 funding expansion) makes short episodic storytelling cheap and mobile-focused.
Major media partnerships (like the BBC exploring tailored YouTube content) normalize repurposing multimedia across platforms, raising questions about who controls member narratives.

Meanwhile, investigative reporting in 2025 exposed how AI tools could be used to create sexualized or nonconsensual imagery from real photos — a reminder that tools are neutral but harms are not. For community leaders, that combination of capability and risk means policies and consent processes must be airtight.

Core ethical principles

Before any checklist, adopt these non-negotiables:

Transparency: Members must understand whether an asset is AI-assisted, simulated, or a direct recording.
Informed consent: Consent must be explicit, documented, and revocable within clearly defined limits.
Authenticity: Avoid misrepresenting AI-generated or composite testimonials as actual, live events.
Proportionality & dignity: Consider emotional risk and stigma — reenactments of trauma need special safeguards or should be avoided.
Member rights: Honor rights to withdraw, edit, or request removal within reasonable production constraints.

"Consent is continuous, not a checkbox. Members must be able to see, review, and rescind how their likeness or story is used."

What counts as an AI testimonial or simulated reenactment?

Practical definitions for policy clarity:

AI testimonial: Any testimonial that is created, edited, or enhanced using AI — including voice synthesis, facial reenactment, script augmentation, or composite clips pulled from multiple sources.
Simulated reenactment: A recreated scene using actors, AI-generated faces/voices, or a mix of real footage and synthetic elements intended to represent a member’s experience.

Labeling matters. Always mark synthetic parts clearly in captions and descriptions — viewers deserve to know when they are watching constructed content.

Traditional release forms often assume a one-time, irrevocable permission. AI introduces new dimensions:

Repurposing risk: AI can repurpose recorded voices/imagery into new content variations not anticipated in original releases.
Scope drift: A testimonial recorded for a closed-group newsletter could be later used for public fundraising on a mass platform.
Nonconsensual synthesis: Tools have proven able to produce highly convincing but fabricated scenes using public images or minimal input.

So community consent must be granular, time-limited, and reversible where possible.

Adopt this five-step consent framework before producing or publishing any AI-assisted testimonial:

Inform: Explain what AI will do. Use simple language: "We may use AI voice smoothing, remove background noise, or create a short reenactment using an actor."
Scope & purpose: Specify where the content will appear (email, social media, paid ads, fundraising pages) and for how long.
Granular options: Offer separate checkboxes for each use: internal community, public fundraising, promotional licensing, affiliate monetization.
Revocation & edits: Explain how a member can request removal or changes, what timeframe applies, and what permanent copies may remain in archives.
Verification & proof: Provide a downloadable copy of the final asset for approval before public release and a signed digital record of consent.

Use plain-language clauses in your release forms. Here are examples you can adapt:

AI Use: "I understand this testimonial may be edited using artificial intelligence (for example: voice enhancement, synthetic background, or simulated reenactment). I consent to the described AI-assisted edits only for the uses checked below."
Scope: "I consent to release this content for: [ ] Internal community only [ ] Public fundraising campaigns [ ] Social media promotion [ ] Licensed distribution. I do NOT consent to: [ ] Selling my likeness to third parties without additional consent."
Revocation: "I may request removal or modification by contacting [contact]. Requests received before publication will be honored. Post-publication removal will be handled within [X] days; archival copies may persist for compliance with record-keeping laws."

Checklist: Producing an ethical AI testimonial

Before you press publish, run through this operational checklist:

Do you have explicit, documented consent covering AI elements and distribution channels?
Have members reviewed and approved a final cut where their likeness is used (real or simulated)?
Is any simulated reenactment clearly labeled in the video and description?
Have you assessed emotional risk and offered support resources when needed?
Is sensitive personal data minimized or anonymized if unnecessary?
Have you stored consent records and asset provenance metadata securely?
Do you have a plan and timeline for honoring removal requests?

Navigating fundraising specifics and legal compliance

Fundraising adds a layer of regulatory scrutiny. Donors, regulators, and platform policies expect truthful representation. When using AI testimonials for donations or awareness campaigns, follow these rules:

Truth-in-advertising

Claiming a testimonial reflects a "real member" when it's fabricated can be fraud in many jurisdictions. Always disclose when content is AI-assisted or simulated. If a reenactment compresses multiple stories into one composite, label it as a composite and avoid implying it's a single individual's account.

Charity and nonprofit regulations

Different countries have rules about testimonial use in charity appeals. Regulators increasingly require transparency about how funds will be used and may view deceptive content as misleading fundraising. Get legal advice when campaigns reach large audiences or solicit significant donations.

Privacy & biometric laws

Be aware of laws that affect the use of likeness or biometric data:

EU AI Act: By 2026, high-risk AI rules and transparency requirements are in effect in many EU contexts. AI-generated content that impersonates real people may trigger obligations for explainability and human oversight.
US state laws: Illinois’ BIPA and California’s CPRA restrict certain uses of biometric data and require notice/consent for commercial uses of personal data. Using face or voice synthesis may implicate these protections.

When in doubt, consult counsel and default to stricter privacy standards.

Case studies: Good and bad approaches

CareCircle, a bereavement support community, wanted to raise funds for an expanded peer-coaching program. Instead of filming grieving members, they asked one volunteer to record a real testimony and separately produced a carefully labeled reenactment using an actor. Members were shown the final assets, signed granular consent forms allowing the reenactment for external fundraising only, and were offered counseling resources. CareCircle also published a short explainer video about the AI tools and included a provenance badge linking to a page that describes how content was made.

Bad example — Platform-driven synthetic clips

A different community used a vertical video app’s AI features to stitch member quotes into short ads. The platform’s default settings generated synthetic voice smoothing and a background composite without explicit member permission. The result: members complained about loss of control, and one clip — reinterpreted by an algorithm — misrepresented a member’s experience, causing reputational harm and donor complaints.

Technology controls & provenance

Technology can help enforce ethics:

Watermarking & metadata: Embed visible labels and machine-readable metadata indicating AI-assisted creation and source consent status.
Provenance tools: Use AI provenance standards (where available) to certify what parts are synthetic and who authorized them.
Human-in-the-loop auditing: Require human review for any AI-generated reenactment that references real members.
Secure storage: Keep consent forms, release dates, and content versions in an encrypted, auditable archive.

Third-party verification

Consider independent audits or a community ethics board to sign off on campaign materials. In 2026, expect donors and platforms to treat verified provenance as a trust signal.

Monetization and member compensation

When testimonials generate revenue — either directly (course sales, paid webinars) or indirectly (higher fundraising conversions) — fair compensation and transparency are essential:

Offer revenue share or honoraria for members whose likenesses are used in campaigns that generate income.
Be explicit about whether testimonials may be licensed to third parties; obtain separate consent for licensing.
Document any payments and provide tax guidance where necessary.

Making compensation standard, even modest, signals respect and reduces power imbalances between organizers and members.

Special considerations for sensitive topics

Issues like trauma, sexual assault, bereavement, and medical struggles require extra care:

Avoid simulated reenactments that depict traumatic events unless a member explicitly requests it and a licensed clinician is consulted.
Always offer anonymized or text-based alternatives for members uncomfortable with video or voice use.
Provide trigger warnings and links to support resources on any public page with sensitive content.

Operational policy template: Quick-start rules for groups

Adopt these rules as part of your community policy — customize for your context.

No publication of AI-assisted testimonial content without documented, granular consent.
All synthetic or simulated elements must be clearly labeled in the asset and caption.
Members may revoke consent; handle removal requests within 14 business days for public-facing assets.
Monetary uses require an explicit compensation agreement.
High-risk reenactments (trauma, medical) require clinical review and separate opt-in.
Keep consent and provenance records for at least five years or longer if required by law.

Practical steps: How to implement this in your community

Start small and document everything. Here’s a straightforward project plan:

Audit existing assets. Identify any testimonial content that might already contain AI edits or synthetic elements.
Draft an AI-use policy and consent template based on the samples above.
Convene a small advisory panel of members and an external ethics reviewer if possible.
Pilot one campaign using the full consent process, provenance labelling, and compensation where applicable.
Collect feedback, adjust policy, and scale gradually.

Tools & partners to consider (as of 2026)

Look for platforms and vendors that support provenance tags, visible watermarking, and consent management features. Prioritize vendors with robust content-moderation policies — especially in light of past platform misuse examples.

Final guidance: Build trust before you build narratives

Using AI to craft more effective outreach and fundraising is a legitimate strategy for small communities and coaches. But it succeeds only when members feel respected and in control of their stories. Transparency, granular consent, traceable provenance, fair compensation, and a low-tolerance policy for deception are the practical building blocks.

Remember: platforms and funding trends (from Holywater’s growth to broadcaster-platform deals) will continue to lower production costs. Your ethical framework is what protects your community’s reputation and members’ dignity as digital storytelling becomes ever more powerful.

Actionable takeaways

Create a clear consent form with separate checkboxes for AI edits, distribution channels, and monetization.
Always label simulated reenactments and composites; never imply synthetic content is a live recording.
Offer members control: preview assets, sign off, and an accessible removal process.
Budget for compensation and third-party provenance verification for fundraising campaigns.
When in doubt, default to privacy and dignity — especially with trauma-related content.

Closing call-to-action

If you lead or plan a community campaign that will use AI-assisted testimonials, start with a pilot that follows the checklist above. Join our facilitator workshop at connects.life to download reusable consent templates, get a sample policy tailored for coaches and community leaders, and review real-world scripts for safe reenactments. Lead with care — your members’ trust is your greatest asset.

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.